The Linchpin To The Mongolian Empire: Origins of the Mongol State (Part 2)

Map of Mongolian Dynasty

Control over the Stepps was vital in the legitimization of Chinggis Khan. However, he had to overtake Ong-Qan as the primary power in the region. This is because Ong-Qan increased his political power by creating a tribal confederacy. Thus, Chinggis Khan was not the first tribal leader to unify Mongolia. However, Chinggis Khan successfully took control of the Stepps because he did not simply establish a tribal confederacy. Timothy May stated “the tribal society of Mongolia had drastically changed from the time prior to Chinggis Khan accession to dominance.”(14) He understood that he needed to rely on the select few he trusted to unify and rule Mongolia.

Chinggis Khan did not simply conquer and maintain the Mongolian and Turkish tribes but also ensured their incorporation into the Mongol state after conquest. As a result, individual tribes no longer existed after conquest. This occurred through Chinggis Khans ability to incorporate these tribes into the Minqan – the first method of organization used that were loyal to him – which created a new state that eliminated the tribal heritage of Mongolia. This was a vital step to establishing the Mongol Empire because “[t]he social features of the clan and tribe have not been entirely compatible with the requirements of imperial organizations.”(15) Therefore, the needs to transform the political, cultural, religious, and economic aspects were vital to the success of the Mongol Empire. Furthermore, Lawrence Krader stated “in order to have a durable state, a form of citizenship is necessary which is recognizable and comparable throughout the empire; taxation, tribute collection, military organization,…are needed for government of a complex state and social organization.”(16) The Mongol tribal heritage did not suffice these needs. As a result, the implementation of a syncretic process occurred. Chinggis Khan was interested in gaining wealth and power for his family. Thus, his family and political power were intertwined throughout the history of the empire. The new organization of Mongolia linked itself to the Chinggis Khan Family.

The new organization emerged linked to the Chinggis Khans family because all the other elite tribal leaders lost their political power. The tribal leaders lost their political power because they lost geographical control. In short, the ruling individual or group needed to remove the significance to legitimize their dynasty. This control aided geographical position to family ties. A sense of citizenship was fostered as a result Chinggis Khan’s legitimization and the centralization of power. In addition, the process of building a military organization over tribal units enabled there to be basic administrative structures to build upon. Through this period, the formation of a tribal confederation required a rising Mongol figure to control Orkhan Valley to legitimize his power.

The linchpin to geographical control was the Orkhan Valley. The regions significance is understood but the exact reasons why are unclear. However, what is known is that who ever “acquired a political and spiritual focus that gave legitimacy to the tribe [or family] that held it.”(17) The significance of Orkhan Valley is uncertain but it held political significance centered on the fact it provided the ruler with the resources and support necessary to rule the region. In addition, Larry Moses speculated that there are two reasons behind the significance of the Orkhan Valley, which appear to be similar.

In his article, “A Theoretical Approach to the Process of Inner Asian Confederation,” Larry Moses discussed the two plausible explanations that appear to be similar, but there are minor differences. The first reason is that the people from the local tribes would declare their allegiance to the ruler who controlled the region because of the political and religious significance the region garnered from family traditions. Secondly, the surrounding tribes would accept the ruler as the regional leader.(18) The tribal leaders accepted the regional leader but they would not accept a position of lesser standing. Furthermore, for a tribal leader to declare that another held a greater standing is a significant occurrence. The loss of the Orkhan Valley resulted in the invalidation of the ruler’s legitimization. For this reason, throughout Chinggis Khans rise to power, Ong-Qan attempted to gain control of Orkhan Valley. However, in time, Chinggis Khan defeated Ong-Oan putting himself in position as the legitimate authority in the Steppes. The successors of Chinggis Khan benefited from the importance of geography declining.

The kin of Chinggis Khan benefited from the importance of the declining requirement of geography control. Chinggis Khan accomplished this by investing his own bloodline with centralized power and removing other tribal elites. In addition, he possibly removed the Orkhan Valley factor in Steppe politics.(19) Although he increased the importance of family succession, he restricted the power of the Altan Uray, which prevented them from being the linchpin of power and leadership in the region. “In an attempt to counter the importance of his own family, Chinggis Khan created another elite group [noyad] among his military commanders.”(20) In theory, the noyad served the altan uruy but in the end, they obeyed and advised the qayan – particularly Chinggis Khan and his successors.(21) The military is a significant factor in Mongol expansion but the civil administration facilitated further expansion.

The success of the Mongol military enabled the quick conquest of regions but the effective civil administration allowed further expansion. The development of the administrative structures evolved similarly to everything else in the empire. This is vital because the Mongols would not have been able to maintain expansion without it to keep the empire from collapsing under mismanagement. The redeeming feature is the empire not ceasing to share responsibilities with the military. However, this relationship enabled the military civil administrative organization known as the tamma to control the newly conquered regions. Unfortunately, the tamma military was not effective at governing a region efficiently. Consequently, there was a need for an effective and efficient civil administration because the tamma’s attempt to operate a government withheld it from moving to new conquests. It is the implementation of a civil administration that allowed the tamma military to advance to conquer new regions and allowed them to become integrated into the empire. This required a new ruling establishment.

The Minqan became the Mongols first ruling establishment but the government became more complex as the empire expanded. This development led to the tamma, which was the most important institution the Mongols used to rule.(22) In the early stage of the Mongol Administration, they were only concerned with the deployment of military units and obtaining wares to reward the individuals who partook in the raids and wars. The tamma were stationed on the fringes of the Mongol Empire.

The tamma were always on the borders of the Mongol Empire between the nomadic and sedentary cultures.(23) The stabilization of the regions led to the transformation of the empires structure.(24) Consequently, governors and their secretaries were sent and an administrator would replace the tamma commander. The administrative apparatus was a logical choice through the initial phase of conquest. However, the evolution of the empire and its goals required the administrative structure to evolve more. The developing civil administration was not to only be concerned with the military, but with the governance of the conquered regions as well. The keshik emerged from the administrative institution as head of their own office.

The keshik emerged from the administrative institution, as warlords became heads of administrative offices.(25) The keshik not only served as security but also was also responsible for the royal household and administration duties. The keshik were “initially comprised of nokod, or the companions and followers of Chinggis Khan, even after his death [they] still served as a training ground for not only generals but administrators as well.”(26) The important factor is they demonstrated their loyalty to the gayen when they served in the prior keshik. A member of the keshik would serve a term as an officer or administrator to maintain the good standing of the relationship. The keshik returned to their duties once the term was completed.(27) It is under Mongke that the Mongol administrative system underwent numerous reforms.

The Mongol Empires administration system undertook significant reforms under Mongke.(28) The reforms purpose was to lessen the burden the Mongol empire placed on the sedentary population. The Mongol empire undertook these reforms to help the sedentary population to seek, which benefited them in the end because of the opportunity of trade and agriculture. In addition, Mongke aspired to restore the imperial authority over the Chinggisids. As a result, damage to property decreased while people within war zones maintained and safeguarded economic growth, and the long-term possibility of conquered regions.(29) In terms of taxation, Mongke insisted that the Mongols would benefit in the long term in terms of taxation if they kept damage to a minimum. The Mongol Empires policy not to gain through plunder and preying resulted in the Mongols need to obtain fiscal resources by other means. As a result, the Mongol Empire created fiscal territories.

The division of territories into separate fiscal regions occurred to obtain and maintain control over the fiscal resources within the Mongol empire. During the reign of Guyuk the Mongol revenue districts were consolidated into three regions. However, Turkistan cannot be viewed like other regions – as a nomadic reservoir – because the populations across the Silk Road provided an abundant amount of wealth. Prior to the implementation of the tax system the Mongols regularly plundered wealth from the sedentary population. Furthermore, the implementation of the tax system resulted in the plundering of sedentary subjects to decrease. In the infancy of Mongol Society, tributes were a regular occurrence to illustrate the loyalty an individual had for a ruler, unlike a levy that was used to meet a particular need.(30) In time, the Mongol empire set a fixed rate tribute based upon possessions. However, when on conquest, it was common practice for the Mongols to demand goods or enforce levies to obtain what they needed from recent conquered regions. Nevertheless, the Mongols saw the benefits of converting to a regularized tax system.

Continue reading

“The Great Mystery of the Human Heart”

Quoting A. W. Tozer from “Experiencing The Presence of God: Teachings From the Book of Hebrews.”

Of all of God’s creation, man is the only creature implanted with spiritual aspirations, leading him to prayer and worship. Wherever you find man, you will find him engaged in some sort of worship. No mistake about it, something within the creature lifts itself up in response to something within the Creator. That ‘something’ is the great mystery of the human heart created in the image of God.

 

The Linchpin To The Mongolian Empire: Introduction (Part 1)

Mongolian CrossingOnce established, the Mongol Empire under Chinggis Khan, Ogodei Khan, and Mongke illustrated its willingness to accept the practice of other religions and in some cases even accepted the religion for themselves. To understand this we can rely on the general ideas from The Secret History of the Mongols(1) and the observations of the European travelers, John of Plano Carpini and William of Rubruck can be relied upon to provide well adequate information to believe that the Mongols had religious beliefs and practices.(2) However, Mongol religious beliefs centered upon their moral and social viewpoints. These beliefs are the foundation of their shamanistic religion. The Mongols religion was exclusive to their tribal heritage. In addition, they firmly believed that they had “access to, and influence in, the world of good and evil spirits.”(3) Therefore, their shamanistic religion is not conducive to being a widespread religion like Christianity or Islam. Consequently, the Mongols had to either take a policy of least resistance and adopt a religion and practices or stay isolated. The Mongols realized that their tribal heritage did not provide the administrative experience to rule a state. As a result, “it was not long before they took the line of least resistance and adopted, in the various parts of their empire, a more developed religion learned from their conquered subjects.”(4) The Mongols purpose was to use religion as a syncretic tool to reach their goals in any specific region. Therefore, the policy on religion became a linchpin to the success and later failure of the Mongol Empire.

The Mongols made the decision to adopt or adapt to the religious beliefs of regions they conquered because it was influential in creating and managing a state. However, every other nation, during this period, favored a policy that accepted one religion over another, creating an alliance with church and state. Consequently, how did Chinggis Khan and his immediate successors manage to create a state, with all the institutions and bureaucracy needed to run an empire, out of a tribal heritage? What resources did they draw upon? How did this influence their policy toward religion and the state? How does policy on religion change with the breakup of the Mongol Empire?

From the beginning of the Mongol empire, under Genghis Khan until two or three generations after his death, many Mongol rulers chose not to institute a state religion. Rather the Mongol rulers chose to embrace peoples of many different religions and ethnicities into their empire, upon an equal playing field with each other. However, the Mongols did not consider conquered peoples on the same level as themselves. The Mongols did not impose a state religion upon the regions they conquered because they were a coalition of Asiatic and Turkish tribes that consisted of multiple ethnicities and religions – hence the linchpin underlining their classification as shamans. The Mongols understood that to adopt or adapt to the conquered religion would be easier and more affective than attempt to implement their belief system in any specific region.(5)

Genghis Khan understood that the Mongols had vastly different religious and cultural traditions than the conquered peoples, which resulted in their need to find a common place to start. Furthermore, he understood that the conversion(6) of “pre-modern peoples to adopt or adapt foreign cultural traditions for political, social, or economic purposes.”(7) He understood that the acceptance of cultural traditions sometimes attracts individuals to foreign cultural traditions or gain political or military support to an expanding cultural tradition. However, he needed a syncretic course of action encircling the three modes of cross-cultural conversion and syncretism that are rarely effective when isolated but are highly effective when incorporated with each other.(8) This syncretic process is vital to the process of state building because this approach intertwines numerous aspects between two vastly different societies’ cultural differences.

The Mongols were a small group of loosely connected nomadic tribes while the regions they conquered were established states. Therefore, the Mongol culture was vastly different in 1206 as Chinggis Khan and immediate successors conquered numerous regions that included the Ukraine, Russia, Iraq, Iran, China, Korea, Vietnam and many of the lands in between. The Mongols lack of administrative skills was a common trait among conquerors but they became historically unique as they approach the process of state building in a syncretic method. However, David Ringrose in Expansion and Global Interaction, 1200-1700(9) clearly synthesizes the significance of the Mongols role in the development of the political, cultural, religious, and economic development. In addition, the historian Thomas Allsen provides an in depth overarching foundation of Mongol state building. His linchpin work, Mongol Imperialism, clearly explains the foundation of state building by outlining “The Politics of Centralization,” “The Tools of Centralization,” “Population Registration,” “Taxation,” and “Recruitment of Manpower.”(10) It provides the reader with an excellent in depth-synthesized source on Mongol history. In addition, the work by David Morgan, The Mongols, is an excellent introductory study that is a critical evaluation of other historian’s hypotheses. Ultimately, these discussions provide excellent examination of Mongol history but cannot be the backbone of this papers research.

Continue reading

A Blogging Reflection & Intro To The Wizard of Westwood

John Wooden at a ceremony on Oct. 14, the coac...

John Wooden at a ceremony on Oct. 14, the coach’s 96th birthday, to name the Reseda post office after the sports legend and long-time San Fernando Valley resident. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

First and foremost, I need to give some personal thoughts on my blogging experience over the past several months.

I initially started blogging on Tumblr, but that seemed to just fade into the night for two reasons. First, I really did not have a writing directions. Secondly, I did not like the ecosystem that Tumblr provided. As a result, I let my blogging life go. However, I do not remember how, but I heard about WordPress and checked the platform out. Simply, everything about it is a complete 180 from Tumblr, which helped sparked my interest. In addition, what kick started my desire to begin blogging again is that I felt I need to write on various topics I know about and make it available someone. So, these two variables are the main reasons why I got started blogging once again.

I was intent on two things when I made the decision to start blogging again on WordPress again. First, I was I made the decision that I wanted it to be fun blogging on topics I knew. Second, I wanted it to be personally fulfilling as well.

My whole blogging experience has not only been totally fulfilling, but it has surpassed any and all expectations I have had. I have been blessed by the many subscribed readers that have been faithful in reading everything I have posted, and have made several positive comments to me through various means. To them, I have to simply say thank you, and say that everyone of you are appreciated.

The one aspect that has been something I never could of dreamed, has been the opportunities I have had to write several guest articles for Reagan Coalition and an article for Walk Good (a Christian marriage and apologetic ministry for Josh Fults). These opportunities have truly been nothing less than what anyone can expect. They have and are truly a blessing! The links to these article’s can be found on my blogs Guest Article’s page.

Please forgive me for my little introductory rant for this post, but it seems beneficial as I sit here writing it. The purpose of it was to convey the honor I have received by Josh Fults asking me to complete a guest post for his blog Walk Good once again.

The first time he asked me if I wanted to write I guest article, I first thought “Are you kidding me?”…. Then “Why ask me?” “I don’t know anything about what you cover.” But, I certainly was humbled and honored by his offering, and blessed with the opportunity to write a guest post on a topic I could choose for myself, which ended up being on Man’s Innate Desire To Worship. I certainly felt out-of-place to a degree writing this first article for Josh, and defiantly never expected him to ask me ever again to write a guest post for his blog. But guess what? He has done exactly that! Once again, I felt amazed and honored for the opportunity with no idea what I would write about.

I was not sure what to write about, than I realized I should simply correlate something to what John Wooden is all about since I have reflected on various Wooden quotes. So, I have completed that task and find it a thoughtful piece. The following is a drop quote from the article:

I have a goal to one day have something in common with Coach Wooden, but it is not related to his coaching success. Rather, it is his passion and love for a particular book.

I hope you will visit Walk Good and give the article The Wizard of Westwood a read.

Troubling Development: Rift Between White House & Israel Growing As Threat of War Rises

 

English: Flag of Israel with the Mediterranean...

English: Flag of Israel with the Mediterranean sea in the background, in Rishon LeZion. עברית: דגל ישראל בראשון לציון (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The renowned Joel Rosenberg published this article titled “TROUBLING DEVELOPMENT: RIFT BETWEEN WHITE HOUSE & ISRAEL GROWING AS THREAT OF WAR RISES” on his blog, which is found here under, on September 4, 2012.  This article is a vital read for all those that support Israel and/or find it important to keep strong relationships with our allies.

In recent days, anyone watching U.S.-Israel relations has seen a very troubling development: the already serious rift between the current White House and Israel is growing. The relationship between President Obama and Prime Minister Netanyahu has been strained for nearly four years. But as the threat of war between Israel and Iran this fall continues to rise, the Obama administration seems to be intentionally signaling a growing distance from the Netanyahu government.

Consider these examples: The White House is downscaling U.S. participation in long-planned joint military exercises in October. The Obama administration is sending private messages to Iran saying the U.S. won’t back an Israeli strike as long as Iran doesn’t strike U.S. interests (suggesting that the State of Israel isn’t an American interest). The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs told reporters in London that the U.S. doesn’t want to be “complicit” in an Israeli first strike. “Complicit” is a criminal word, implying an Israeli act of self-defense could be illegal, yet America’s top military official used the word anyway. What’s more, the Democratic National Committee this week has even removed pro-Israel elements used in previous DNC platforms — such as asserting Jerusalem is the official capital of Israel and shouldn’t be divided; remaining committed to maintaining Israel’s qualitative military advantage over its neighbors; and describing Hamas as a terrorist organization that should be negotiated with — out of its official 2012 platform, something that could only be done with the direct support of the President and his senior advisors.

These developments add to a troubling trend which is making Israeli officials and citizens feel more alone against the Iran nuclear threat than ever before. Will war erupt this fall? That remains to be seen. But U.S.-Israeli relations have rarely been this strained on the eve of major Mideast hostilities. Please pray for the Lord to change the heart of President Obama and his advisors, and that they would change course and truly and publicly stand firmly with Israel, our most faithful ally in all of the epicenter. As we read in Genesis 12:1-3, God promises to bless those who bless Israel, and curse those who curse Israel. With America facing a growing risk of economic and moral implosion, now is certainly not the time to turn our backs on Israel.

It is certainly troubling that the U.S. administration and the Democratic National Committee has made the commitment to basically turn our back against Israel, and changed our decades long policy to support the sovereignty and military defense of Israel.  This is certainly the tense situation I have been afraid of becoming true the last several years. I sincerely hope this situation it resolved shortly. Furthermore, I hope that the U.S. makes a return to its historical policies with Israel. However, that is very unlikely under the current administration as they have shown favor to Muslim led nations.

 

Supreme Court Justice Eric Holder

English: The United States Supreme Court, the ...

English: The United States Supreme Court, the highest court in the United States, in 2010. Top row (left to right): Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Stephen G. Breyer, Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, and Associate Justice Elena Kagan. Bottom row (left to right): Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice Antonin Scalia, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy, and Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

I must acknowledge that the following is provided by Jim Piper, who I must thank tremendously for bringing this information to my attention and has allowed me to present it here.

Columnist Andrew McCarthy gives us what probably is the most important question regarding the upcoming presidential election.

If Mitt wins the nomination, I will enthusiastically support his candidacy. For my friends who have hesitation on that score, I would just ask you to keep four things in mind:

  1.  Justice Scalia just turned 78
  2. Justice Kennedy will turn 78 later this year
  3. Justice Breyer will be 76 in August
  4.  Justice Ginsburg turned 81 about a week ago.
In addition, Justice Ginsburg has Pancreatic Cancer. Justice Stephens has already said he would retire and is just waiting for Obama to be reelected. The next president could appoint as many as 4 new Justices over next 8 years. This election is about more than ObamaCare Tax.We wish them all well, of course, but the brute fact is that whoever we elect as president in November is almost certainly going to choose at least one new member of the Supreme Court, in addition to hundreds of other life-tenured federal judges, all of whom will be making momentous decisions about our lives for decades to come.If you don’t think it matters whether the guy making those calls is Mitt Romneyor Barack Obama, I think you’re smokin’ something funky.So for anybody who is thinking of not voting because your favorite didn’t get nominated, or writing in a candidate who can’t win, imagine this:

Supreme Court Justice Eric Holder.

After you have stopped gasping, kindly send this forward to your list of concerned citizens.

King Arthur Is a Myth, But His Chivalry Is Our Desired Reality

I am writing this whole article to present The Knight’s Medieval Code of Chivalry. However, before we talk about it, let’s try to outlay what we think when we hear the word Chivalry. I know as a child, when I heard the word “chivalry,” I often thought about the many stories I heard or seen in a cartoon or movie about “King Arthur.” Lets go beyond this.

We know that he was a legendary British leader between the late 5th and early 6th centuries that became known for leading the defense of Britain against the Saxon invaders and established an empire that encompassed Britain, Ireland, Iceland, Norway, and Gaul, according to romanticized medieval histories. As a result, King Arthur’s existence is largely questioned and debated among modern historians as the details of his story are mostly made up of folklore and literary invention.

The reliable historical background available that mentions King Arthur is limited, but does include the Annales Cambriae, the Historia Brittonum, and the writings of Gildas. The story of King Arthur began to become legendary, primarily, when he was developed as a person of international interest in the  History of the Kings of Britain by Geoffrey of Monmouth.

It is unknown how much of this work was based on earlier sources or invented by Geoffrey of Monmouth himself. There are some stories and poems by Welsh and Breton, which were originated before the History of the Kings of Britain. This “historical” work portrays King Arthur as a great warrior that defended Great Britain from human and supernatural enemies or as a magical character of folklore.

Despite the various stories, events, and characters surrounding King Arthur, which differ from text to text, not a single text has distinguished itself as the  centerpiece behind the stories, events, and characters of the Arthurian story.  However, Geoffrey of Monmouth’s version has often served as the beginning point for stories that have followed his.

There are now many pieces of the Arthurian story that appear in the History of the Kings of Britain, which includes King Arthur’s father Uther Pendragon, the wizard Merlin, Arthur’s wife Guinevere, his sword Excalibur, Arthur’s conception at Tintagel, his last battle against Mordred, and last rest in Avalon.

In the twelfth century, the French writer Chrétien de Troyes, who added Lancelot and Holy Grail to the discourse,  began the genre of Arthurian romance which became an integral part of medieval literature. The common occurrence in the French stories is the narrative often shifting focus from King Arthur to other characters, such as a member or members of the Knights of the Round Table.

The popularity of Arthurian literature soared during the Middles ages, but waned in the following centuries until a resurgence occurred in the 19th century. The myth of King Arthur defiantly lives on in the 21st century in literature  theater, movies, television, comics and other adaptations.

I am sure everyone on of us as our favorite telling of King Arthur that represents stories of honor, loyalty, and chivalry among threats to  what he loves most, his wife,his people, his kingdom, or his knights.

In short, it is clear that the stories of the romanticized King Arthur we have become fond of are simply tales. However, I do believe we are truly fond of these tales, despite there many mistakes or bits of pure myth that can be pointed out, because they integrate a virtue that we hold dear in all our hearts and wish it upon our own societies – the knight’s code of chivalry.

What Is Chivalry?

Lets first define what Chivalry is. It is the moral and social law and custom of the noble and gentle class in Western Europe during the Middle Ages, and the result of that law and custom in action.

What Is The Historical Background of The Knight’s Chivalry Code

From the beginning of the Middle Ages, knights have been seen as chivalrous men who fought to protect honor, valor and the occasional damsel in distress. The tradition started as early as the 9th and 10th centuries and then flourished into what we know of knights in the 12th and 13th centuries before losing its appeal at the end of the Middle Ages. The Knight’s Code, or what some dub as the Chivalric Code, had heavy Christian influences. During the early Middle Ages, churches in Europe proposed that knights were not allowed to attack peasants, women, priests and merchants. In addition, they were not allowed to do battle on Sundays or other holy days. These rules and regulations were known as the Peace of God and the Truce of God. Although these programs were not strictly enforced by the church, the ideas were still heavily regarded. Through the years, knights became more romanticized and their way of life became common practice for European nobility in the 15th and 16th centuries. Much of it was to preserve the knight’s legend and lead a dignified life.

The Knight’s Code

The Code of Chivalry described in the Song of Roland, which is an excellent illustration of the Knights Code of Chivalry, are outlined below. An interesting nugget of information is that at least twelve of the seventeen points of Knight’s Code relate to acts of  chivalry compared to acts of combat. The Knight’s Code is outlined here-under:

  • To Fear God and maintain His Church
  • T0 Serve the liege lord in valour and faith
  • To Protect the weak and defenseless
  • To Give succour to widows and orohans
  • Refrain from the wanton giving of offense
  • Live by honor and glory
  • Despise pecuniary reward
  • Fight for the welfare of all
  • Obey those placed in authority
  • Guard the honor of fellow knights
  • Eschew unfairness, meanness and deceit
  • Keep faith
  • Speak the truth at all time
  • Persevere to the end in any situation
  • Respect the honor of women
  • Never refuse a challenge from an equal
  • Never turn your back to an enemy

Chivalry Code Benefits

The benefit of the code was to protect ones honor and introduce and show chivalry toward others. Many of us today, see knights as those to depend on when trouble arises. Knights certainly helped in providing added protection to a castle for the benefit of a king and noblemen within it.  However, more importantly, they were sought after in consideration of issues of etiquette, hunting and tournaments. Knight’s completely followed the Knight’s Code, which only helped strengthen their society. As a result, their presence made it a better place.

Conclusion

There are few misconceptions about to the Knight’s Code. The majority of knights believed and held dear to the code. As a result, they lived out the code. However, some feel that the Knight’s Code is not about outward actions but a state of mind, while others believe that being a knight, and its code, were solely based on physical ability over being born into a knighted family.

Despite these misconceptions, the one thing I am sure we could get a consensus on is that we all would desire the knight’s code of chivalry to become reality in our own nation, state, or city. That is a great desire to have for where ever we might live. However, lets not forget, no matter how it was viewed among the knights centuries ago, the code did begin within the individual lives of the knights and their families. So, lets make it our collective goal to begin the implementation, if you so do wish, in our personal lives.